CAR ACCIDENT | HOW IS FAULT DETERMINED AFTERWARDS?

CAR ACCIDENT

An accident, by definition, is unexpected and unintentional. No one can truly prepare for an automobile accident. No one wants to get in a car accident, but no one knows just when they will occur.

In all likelihood, everyone will find themselves in a situation involving a car accident at least once in their life. It is essential to educate yourself as to the proper procedures following a car accident. That way, no matter how much adrenaline may be coursing through your body, you can remain calm knowing what step you should take next.

Seeking legal representation is a crucial step if you are involved in a car accident.

HOW DO INSURANCE COMPANIES INVESTIGATE A CAR ACCIDENT CLAIM?

The most important factor insurance companies use in determining what actually happened is the police report. Individual claims from each party involved may conflict with other information or contain personal bias.

Insurers use the official police report as a cornerstone for figuring out fault. Additionally, insurers also use any evidence gathered by you to support any claims of fault or deniability further.

Taking photos of the scene and all cars involved, gathering information from other drivers and witnesses, and any other pertinent info can help insurers properly assess the situation.

One thing you do not want to do when cooperating with the police and insurance companies is to admit you are at fault. Even if you think you may be the at-fault driver, you may be unaware of other factors that could be the real cause of your accident.

Give only facts and relevant information and let the insurers come to their own objective conclusions.

HOW DO INSURANCE COMPANIES DETERMINE FAULT?

The majority of U.S. states follow a fault-based system. In this system, the at-fault driver is usually responsible for repairs, expenses, and losses through their insurer’s liability coverage.

However, insurers usually determine fault via the state’s legal definition of negligence. There are three main types of negligence used to help assess fault in at-fault states.

  1. Strict Comparative Negligence: With comparative negligence, both parties can be found partially at fault for a given accident. With strict comparative negligence, your percentage at-fault directly determines how much compensation you can seek from the other insurance company. For example, if you are found 70% at fault for an accident, you could still seek up to 30% of your losses to be recouped.

  2. Modified Comparative Negligence: Some states use a modified form of comparative negligence, which limits your ability you recoup loses. For example, Illinois drivers can only seek retribution for their losses if they are found to be less than 50% at fault.

  3. Pure Contributory Negligence: This form of negligence requires a driver to be 100% faultless to recoup any damages. For states with a pure contributory definition of negligence, determining fault is all or nothing. Even if you are only determined to be 5% at fault for an accident, pure contributory negligence states you cannot recoup damages.

    Medical malpractice consultation


Posted by Julian Lewis Sanders

At The Law Offices of Julian Lewis Sanders & Associates, we understand the gravity of personal injury situations - it's our priority. Committed to aiding you in your time of need, we specialize in listening to your story, discerning your individual needs, and swiftly executing strategic actions to secure the compensation you deserve. Based in Georgia, our legal team comprises experienced personal injury attorneys dedicated to delivering optimal service tailored to your unique circumstances.


junio 3rd, 2019